INC MEMBER, UMAMING SINASAMBA NILA SI FELIX MANALO!

Photo courtesy of 

Roland Brenton M. Peña

SA WAKAS AY UMAMIN NA RIN ANG ISANG MIYEMBRO NG IGLESIA NI CRISTO (INC-MANALO) NA SUMASAMBA SILA SA KANILANG "SUGO DAW" NA SI FELIX YSAGUN MANALO. NAHULI RIN SILA SA KANILANG MISMONG POST SA FACEBOOK.

KUNG ATING MAAALALA AY MADALAS NA SIRAAN TAYO NG MGA MIYEMBRO INC NA SUMASAMBA DAW TAYO SA MGA REBULTO. NGAYON NAMAN AY UMAMIN NA ANG ISA NILANG MIYEMBRO NA SUMASAMBA NA SILA SA KANILANG SUGO.

ANG SABI NG BIBLIYA:

(Exodus 20:3 KJV)  Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
 

 

The Iglesia ni Cristo, the True Church???

Iglesia ni Cristo Central Temple

The Iglesia ni Cristo (Tagalog, "Church of Christ") claims to be the true Church established by Christ. Felix Manalo, its founder, proclaimed himself God’s prophet. Many tiny sects today claim to be the true Church, and many individuals claim to be God’s prophet. What makes Iglesia ni Cristo different is that it is not as tiny as others.

Since it was founded in the Philippines in 1914, it has grown to more than two hundred congregations in sixty-seven countries outside the Philippines, including an expanding United States contingent. The Iglesia keeps the exact number of members secret, but it is estimated to be between three million and ten million worldwide. It is larger than the Jehovah’s Witnesses, a better known sect (which also claims to be Christ’s true Church). Iglesia is not better known, despite its numbers, because the majority of Iglesia’s members are Filipino. Virtually the only exceptions are a few non-Filipinos who have married into Iglesia families.

The organization publishes two magazines, Pasugo and God’s Message, which devote most of their energies toward condemning other Christian churches, especially the Catholic Church. The majority of the Iglesia’s members are ex-Catholics. The Philippines is the only dominantly Catholic nation in the Far East, with eighty-four percent of its population belonging to the Church. Since this is its largest potential source of converts, Iglesia relies on anti-Catholic scare tactics as support for its own doctrines, which cannot withstand biblical scrutiny. The Iglesia tries to convince people of its doctrines not by proving they are right, but by attempting to prove the Catholic Church’s teachings are wrong.



Is Christ God?

The Catholic teaching that most draws Iglesia’s fire is Christ’s divinity. Like the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Iglesia claims that Jesus Christ is not God but a created being.

Yet the Bible is clear: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). We know Jesus is the Word because John 1:14 tells us, "The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us." God the Father was not made flesh; it was Jesus, as even Iglesia admits. Jesus is the Word, the Word is God, therefore Jesus is God. Simple, yet Iglesia won’t accept it.

In Deuteronomy 10:17 and 1 Timothy 6:15, God the Father is called the "Lord of lords," yet in other New Testament passages this divine title is applied directly to Jesus. In Revelation 17:14 we read, "They will make war on the Lamb, and the Lamb will conquer them, for he is Lord of lords and King of kings." And in Revelation 19:13–16, John sees Jesus "clad in a robe dipped in blood, and the name by which he is called is The Word of God. . . . On his thigh he has a name inscribed, King of kings and Lord of lords."

The fact that Jesus is God is indicated in numerous places in the New Testament. John 5:18 states that Jewish leaders sought to kill Jesus "because he not only broke the Sabbath but also called God his Father, making himself equal with God." Paul also states that Jesus was equal with God (Phil. 2:6). But if Jesus is equal with the Father, and the Father is a God, then Jesus is a God. Since there is only one God, Jesus and the Father must both be one God—one God in at least two persons (the Holy Spirit, of course, is the third person of the Trinity).

The same is shown in John 8:56–59, where Jesus directly claims to be Yahweh ("I AM"). "‘Your father Abraham rejoiced that he was to see my day; he saw it and was glad.’ The Jews then said to him, ‘You are not yet fifty years old, and you have seen Abraham?’ Jesus said to them, ‘Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I AM.’ So they took up stones to throw at him; but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple." Jesus’ audience understood exactly what he was claiming; that is why they picked up rocks to stone him. They considered him to be b.aspheming God by claiming to be Yahweh.

The same truth is emphasized elsewhere. Paul stated that we are to live "awaiting our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ" (Titus 2:13). And Peter addressed his second epistle to "those who have obtained a faith of equal standing with ours in the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ" (2 Pet. 1:1).

Jesus is shown to be God most dramatically when Thomas, finally convinced that Jesus has risen, falls down and exclaims, "My Lord and my God!" (John 20:28)—an event many in Iglesia have difficulty dealing with. When confronted with this passage in a debate with Catholic Answers founder Karl Keating, Iglesia apologist Jose Ventilacion replied with a straight face, "Thomas was wrong."



God’s Messenger?

Felix Manalo, the last messenger of God???

A litmus test for any religious group is the credibility of its founder in making his claims. Felix Manalo’s credibility and, consequently, his claims, are impossible to take seriously. He claimed to be "God’s messenger," divinely chosen to re-establish the true Church which, according to Manalo, disappeared in the first century due to apostasy. It was his role to restore numerous doctrines that the Church had abandoned. A quick look at Manalo’s background shows where these doctrines came from: Manalo stole them from other quasi-Christian religious sects.
Manalo was baptized a Catholic, but he left the Church as a teen. He became a Protestant, going through five different denominations, including the Seventh-Day Adventists. Finally, Manalo started his own church in 1914. In 1919, he left the Philippines because he wanted to learn more about religion. He came to America, to study with Protestants, whom Iglesia would later declare to be apostates, just like Catholics. Why, five years after being called by God to be his "last messenger," did Manalo go to the U.S. to learn from apostates? What could God’s messenger learn from a group that, according to Iglesia, had departed from the true faith?

The explanation is that, contrary to his later claims, Manalo did not believe himself to be God’s final messenger in 1914. He didn’t use the last messenger doctrine until 1922. He appears to have adopted the messenger doctrine in response to a schism in the Iglesia movement. The schism was led by Teogilo Ora, one of its early ministers. Manalo appears to have developed the messenger doctrine to accumulate power and re-assert his leadership in the church.
This poses a problem for Iglesia, because if Manalo had been the new messenger called by God in 1914, why didn’t he tell anybody prior to 1922? Because he didn’t think of it until 1922. His situation in this respect parallels that of Mormonism’s founder Joseph Smith, who claimed that when he was a boy, God appeared to him in a vision and told him all existing churches were corrupt and he was not to join them, that he would lead a movement to restore God’s true Church. But historical records show that Smith did join an inquirer’s class at an established Protestant church after his supposed vision from God. It was only in later years that Smith came up with his version of the "true messenger" doctrine, proving as much of an embarrassment for the Mormon church as Manalo’s similar doctrine does for Iglesia.



Iglesia Prophesied?

A pillar of Iglesia belief is that its emergence in the Philippines was prophesied in the Bible. This idea is supposedly found in Isaiah 43:5–6, which states, "Fear not, for I am with you; I will bring your offspring from the east, and from the west I will gather you; I will say to the north, ‘Give up,’ and the south, ‘Do not withhold; bring my sons from afar and my daughters from the end of the earth.’"

Iglesia argues that in this verse, Isaiah is referring to the "far east" and that this is the place where the "Church of Christ" will emerge in the last days. This point is constantly repeated in Iglesia literature: "The prophecy stated that God’s children shall come from the far east" (Pasugo, March 1975, 6).

But the phrase "far east" is not in the text. In fact, in the Tagalog (Filipino) translation, as well as in the original Hebrew, the words "far" and "east" are not even found in the same verse, yet the Iglesia recklessly combine the two verses to translate "far east." Using this fallacious technique, Iglesia claims that the far east refers to the Philippines.

Iglesia is so determined to convince its followers of this "fact" that it quotes Isaiah 43:5 from an inexact paraphrase by Protestant Bible scholar James Moffatt that reads, "From the far east will I bring your offspring." Citing this mistranslation, one Iglesia work states, "Is it not clear that you can read the words ‘far east’? Clear! Why does not the Tagalog Bible show them? That is not our fault, but that of those who translated the Tagalog Bible from English—the Catholics and Protestants" (Isang Pagbubunyag Sa Iglesia ni Cristo, 1964:131). The Iglesia accuses everyone else of mistranslating the Bible, when it is Iglesia that is taking liberties with the original language.



The Name Game

Iglesia points to its name as proof it is the true Church. They argue, "What is the name of Christ’s Church, as given in the Bible? It is the ‘Church of Christ.’ Our church is called the ‘Church of Christ.’ Therefore, ours is the Church Christ founded."

Whether or not the exact words "Church of Christ" appear in the Bible is irrelevant, but since Iglesia makes it an issue, it is important to note that the phrase "Church of Christ" never once appears in the Bible.

The verse Iglesia most often quotes on this issue is Romans 16:16: "Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ greet you " (Pasugo, November 1973, 6). But the phrase in this verse is "churches of Christ." And it’s not a technical name. Paul is referring to a collection of local churches, not giving an organizational name.

To get further "proof" of its name, Iglesia cites Acts 20:28: "Take heed therefore . . . to feed the church of Christ which he has purchased with his blood" (Lamsa translation; cited in Pasugo, April 1978). But the Lamsa translation is not based on the original Greek, the language in which the book of Acts was written. In Greek, the phrase is "the church of God" (tan ekklasian tou Theou) not "the church of Christ" (tan ekklasian tou Christou). Iglesia knows this, yet it continues to mislead its members.

Even if the phrase "church of Christ" did appear in the Bible, it would not help Iglesia’s case. Before Manalo started his church, there were already groups calling themselves "the Church of Christ." There are several Protestant denominations that call themselves Church of Christ and use exactly the same argument. Of course, they aren’t the true Church for the same reason Iglesia isn’t—because they were not founded by Christ.



Did Christ’s Church Apostatize?

The doctrines upon which all Iglesia’s other doctrines depend is its teaching that Christ’s Church apostatized in the early centuries. Like Mormonism, the Jehovah’s Witnesses, and other fringe groups, Iglesia asserts that the early Christian Church suffered a total apostasy. It believes in "the complete disappearance of the first-century Church of Christ and the emergence of the Catholic Church" (Pasugo, July-Aug. 1979, 8).

But Jesus promised that his Church would never apostatize. He told Peter, "And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell will not prevail against it" (Matt. 16:18). If his Church had apostatized, then the gates of hell would have prevailed against it, making Christ a liar.

In other passages, Christ teaches the same truth. In Matthew 28:20 he said, "I am with you always even until the end of the world." And in John 14:16, 18 he said, "And I will pray to the Father, and he will give you another Counselor, to be with you forever ... I will not leave you desolate."

If Iglesia members accept the apostasy doctrine, they make Christ a liar. Since they believe Jesus Christ is not a liar, they are ignoring what Christ promised, and their doctrine contradicts Scripture.

They are, however, fulfilling Scripture. While Jesus taught that his Church would never apostatize, the Bible does teach that there will be a great apostasy, or falling away from the Church. Paul prophesies: "[Do not] be quickly shaken in mind or excited . . . to the effect that the day of the Lord has come. Let no one deceive you in any way; for that day will not come, unless the rebellion [Greek: apostasia] comes first" (2 Thess. 2:2–3); "Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by giving heed to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons" (1 Tim. 4:1); and, "For the time is coming when people will not endure sound teaching, but having itching ears they will accumulate for themselves teachers to suit their own liking, and will turn away from listening to the truth and wander into myths" (2 Tim. 4:3–4). By falling away from the Church, members of Iglesia are committing precisely the kind of apostasy of which they accuse the Catholic Church.

The Bible tells us in 1 John 4:1: "Do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are of God; for many false prophets have gone out into the world." Was Felix Manalo a true prophet? Is his church the "true Church?" If we test the claims of Iglesia ni Cristo, the answer is apparent. His total apostasy doctrine is in flat contradiction to Christ’s teaching. There is no way that Iglesia ni Cristo can be the true Church of Christ.

----------------------

Source: Pinoy Catholics

 Catholic Answers

 

A CRITIQUE OF IGLESIA NI CRISTO EXECUTIVE MINISTER EDUARDO V. MANALO’S STATEMENT ON THE RH BILL PART VII

In sheep's clothing: Clothed in white are INC Executive Minister Eduardo V. Manalo with INC ministers

A CRITIQUE OF IGLESIA NI CRISTO EXECUTIVE MINISTER EDUARDO V. MANALO’S STATEMENT ON THE RH BILL

PART VII 

[This is the seventh part of my critique of Iglesia ni Cristo Executive Minister Eduardo V. Manalo’s position on the RH Bill. The words of Mr. Manalo are in green while my comments are in black.]

The RH Bill supported by the Iglesia ni Cristo is also supported by foreign-funded pro-abortion group Likhaan

The Bible instructs married couples not to deprive one another of intimate marital relations for long, extended periods of time; further, any abstinence at all for a married couple is supposed to be with the mutual consent of husband and wife and not for the purpose of preventing pregnancies (I Cor. 7:3-5).

The above statement is presaged by Iglesia ni Cristo Executive Minister Eduardo V. Manalo with his judgment that methods of natural family planning are “immoral, since they contradict the commandment that God has given to married couples.” What commandment is that? Mr. Manalo mentions 1 Corinthians 7:3-5 which says:

“The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband.  The wife does not have authority over her own body but yields it to her husband. In the same way, the husband does not have authority over his own body but yields it to his wife. Do not deprive each other except perhaps by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control” (NIV).

Mr. Manalo says that 1 Corinthians 7:3-5 is the commandment given by God to married couples

Notice that Mr. Manalo categorically calls the above as God’s commandment. But what does the apostle Paul say it is? Let the apostle Paul speak for himself:

“I say this as a concession, not as a command” (1 Cor. 7:6, NIV).

The apostle Paul says it is a concession, not a command. On the other hand, Mr. Eduardo V. Manalo says it is a command – from God, no less. Who are we to believe? The apostle Paul or Mr. Manalo? Does Mr. Manalo read his Bible? If he does, how come he misses that? How dare Mr. Manalo supplant the inspired and infallible Word of God with his human and fallible word! What else is left of Mr. Manalo’s credibility to preach about God’s Word which he distorts and misrepresents? We just simply cannot take his word.

The Apostle St. Paul, the inspired writer of 1 Corinthians 7:3-5 says that it is a concession, not a command (1 Cor. 7:6). Mr. Eduardo V. Manalo on the other hand says that it is God's commandment. Who are we to believe? The apostle Paul or the INC Executive Minister?

“But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel that is different from the one we preached to you, may he be condemned to hell! We have said it before, and now I say it again: if anyone preaches to you a gospel that is different from the one you accepted, may he be condemned to hell!” (Gal. 1:8-9, Good News Translation).

BIBLIYA ANG MAGPAPATUNAY NA "IGLESIA NI CRISTO" NI MANALO ANG IGLESIANG TUMALIKOD

Felix Manalo- ang tagapagtatag ng Iglesia "daw" ni Cristo

Kilala na natin ang Iglesia ni Cristo ni Manalo na nangugunang taga-usig ng Simbahang Katolika. Ayon mismo sa kanila, natalikod daw ang Unang Iglesia. Natalikod daw ang Iglesia Katolika. Hanggang ngayon naman ay wala silang mapatunayan mula sa Bibliya na natalikod "daw" ang unang Iglesia. Subalit anong Iglesia ba ang tunay na tumalikod?? Ayon na rin mismo sa Bibliya. Atin siyasatin ang ilan sa mga doktrina ng Iglesia ni Cristo (1914).

Ayon sa mga miyembro ng sektang ito, naitatag daw ang Iglesia noong 1914. Kasagsagan ng Unang Digmaang Pandaigdig. Katuparan daw ito ng hula sa ebanghelyo ni Mateo namagkakaroon ng Digmaan:

"At mangakakarinig kayo ng mga digmaan at mga alingawngaw ng mga digmaan; ingatan ninyo na huwag kayong magulumihanan: sapagka't kinakailangang ito'y mangyari datapuwa't hindi pa ang wakas. Sapagka't magsisitindig ang bansa laban sa bansa, at ang kaharian laban sa kaharian; at magkakagutom at lilindol sa iba't ibang dako." (Mateo 24:6-7)

Opo. Tama po ang miyembro na INC. Lumitaw ang  "Iglesia ni Cristo" nung kasagsagan ng Unang Digmaang Pandaigdig noong Hulyo 27, 1914. Huwag na tayong tumutol. Ngunit, ano ba ang inaasahang lilitaw habang nagkakaroon ng digmaan? Para mas malinaw, basahin natin ang Chapter 24 ng Ebanghelyo ni Mateo:

1At lumabas si Jesus sa templo, at payaon sa kaniyang lakad; at nagsilapit sa kaniya ang kaniyang mga alagad upang sa kaniya'y ipamalas ang mga gusali ng templo. 2Datapuwa't siya'y sumagot at sa kanila'y sinabi, Hindi baga ninyo nangakikita ang lahat ng mga bagay na ito? katotohanang sinasabi ko sa inyo, Dito'y walang maiiwang isang bato sa ibabaw ng ibang bato, na hindi ibabagsak.

3At samantalang siya'y nakaupo sa bundok ng mga Olivo, ay nagsilapit sa kaniya ng bukod ang mga alagad, na nagsisipagsabi, Sabihin mo sa amin, kailan mangyayari ang mga bagay na ito? at ano ang magiging tanda ng iyong pagparito, at ng katapusan ng sanglibutan?

4At sumagot si Jesus at sinabi sa kanila, Mangagingat kayo na huwag kayong mailigaw ninoman. 5Sapagka't marami ang magsisiparito sa aking pangalan, na mangagsasabi, Ako ang Cristo; at ililigaw ang marami. 6At mangakakarinig kayo ng mga digmaan at mga alingawngaw ng mga digmaan; ingatan ninyo na huwag kayong magulumihanan: sapagka't kinakailangang ito'y mangyari datapuwa't hindi pa ang wakas. 7Sapagka't magsisitindig ang bansa laban sa bansa, at ang kaharian laban sa kaharian; at magkakagutom at lilindol sa iba't ibang dako. 8Datapuwa't ang lahat ng mga bagay na ito ay siyang pasimula ng kahirapan.

9Kung magkagayo'y ibibigay kayo sa kapighatian, at kayo'y papatayin: at kayo'y kapopootan ng lahat ng mga bansa dahil sa aking pangalan. 10At kung magkagayo'y maraming mangatitisod, at mangagkakanuluhan ang isa't isa, at mangagkakapootan ang isa't isa. 11At magsisibangon ang maraming bulaang propeta, at kanilang ililigaw ang marami. 12At dahil sa pagsagana ng katampalasanan, ang pagibig ng marami ay lalamig. 13Datapuwa't ang magtitiis hanggang sa wakas ay siyang maliligtas. 14At ipangangaral ang evangeliong ito ng kaharian sa buong sanglibutan sa pagpapatotoo sa lahat ng mga bansa; at kung magkagayo'y darating ang wakas.

15Kaya nga pagkakita ninyo ng kasuklamsuklam na paninira, na sinalita sa pamamagitan ng propeta Daniel, na natatayo sa dakong banal (unawain ng bumabasa), 16Kung magkagayo'y magsitakas sa mga bundok ang nangasa Judea: 17Ang nasa bubungan ay huwag bumaba upang maglabas ng mga bagay sa loob ng kaniyang bahay: 18At ang nasa bukid ay huwag magbalik upang kumuha ng kaniyang balabal. 19Datapuwa't sa aba ng nangagdadalang-tao at nangagpapasuso sa mga araw na yaon! 20At magsipanalangin kayo na huwag mangyari ang pagtakas ninyo sa panahong taginaw, o sa sabbath man: 21Sapagka't kung magkagayo'y magkakaroon ng malaking kapighatian, na ang gayo'y di pa nangyayari buhat sa pasimula ng sanglibutan hanggang ngayon, at ni hindi na mangyayari kailan man. 22At malibang paikliin ang mga araw na yaon, ay walang lamang makaliligtas: datapuwa't dahil sa mga hirang ay paiikliin ang mga araw na yaon. 23Kung magkagayon, kung may magsabi sa inyong sinomang tao, Narito ang Cristo, o, Nariyan; huwag ninyong paniwalaan. 24Sapagka't may magsisilitaw na mga bulaang Cristo, at mga bulaang propeta, at mangagpapakita ng mga dakilang tanda at mga kababalaghan; ano pa't ililigaw, kung maaari, pati ng mga hirang. 25Narito, ipinagpauna ko nang sinabi sa inyo. 26Kaya nga kung sa inyo'y kanilang sasabihin, Narito, siya'y nasa ilang; huwag kayong magsilabas: Narito, siya'y nasa mga silid; huwag ninyong paniwalaan. 27Sapagka't gaya ng kidlat na kumikidlat sa silanganan, at nakikita hanggang sa kalunuran; gayon din naman ang pagparito ng Anak ng tao. 28Saan man naroon ang bangkay, ay doon mangagkakatipon ang mga uwak.

29Datapuwa't karakarakang pagkatapos ng kapighatian sa mga araw na yaon ay magdidilim ang araw, at ang buwan ay hindi magbibigay ng kaniyang liwanag, at mangalalaglag ang mga bituin mula sa langit, at magsisipangatal ang mga kapangyarihan sa mga langit: 30At kung magkagayo'y lilitaw ang tanda ng Anak ng tao sa langit: at kung magkagayo'y magsisitaghoy ang lahat ng mga angkan sa lupa, at mangakikita nila ang Anak ng tao na napaparitong sumasa mga alapaap ng langit na may kapangyarihan at dakilang kaluwalhatian... (Mateo 24:1-31)

Pansinin. Bago ang binigay nilang bersikulo 6-7 ay ang bersikulo 5 na nagsasabing may mga bulaan na magliligaw sa marami...  Bulaang propeta pala ang lilitaw sa araw ng Digmaan. Ibig sabihin, ang "Iglesia ni Cristo" ni Manalo ay bulaan. Sumulpot sila habang may Digmaan. Nililigaw nila ang maraming tao patungo sa kadiliman.
Ayon naman sa kanilang magasing Pasugo, si Felix Manalo ay sinasabi nilang "Huling Sugo ng Diyos sa mga HULING ARAW".

"Since the pioneering years of the Iglesia ni Cristo during the time of Bro. Felix Y. Manalo, God's messengger in these last days,....(Pasugo March 2012 edition page 22-23)

Kung atin din matatandaan na pinagpauna na ni San Juan na may mga bulaang propeta at Anti-Cristo na lilitaw sa mga huling oras:

"Mumunting mga anak, ito ang huling oras: at gaya ng inyong narinig na darating ang anticristo, kahit ngayon ay lumitaw ang marami nang anticristo; kaya nga nalalaman natin na ito na ang huling oras. Sila'y nangagsilabas sa atin, nguni't sila'y hindi sa atin; sapagka't kung sila'y sa atin ay nagsipanatili sana sa atin: nguni't nangagsilabas, upang sila'y mahayag na silang lahat ay hindi sa atin." (1 Juan 2:18)


Si Felix Manalo kung aalalahanin ay dating Katoliko. Ngunit lumabas sa Santa Iglesia si Manalo at nagtayo ng sarili niyang Iglesia. At ang Iglesia na iyon ay tinawag niyang "Iglesia ni Cristo". Malinaw pa rin sa hula sa Mateo na gagamitin ang pangalan ni Hesus para iligaw ang mga tao (Mateo 24:4). Si Manalo ay tinawag din ng kaniyang miyembro na "Huling Sugo sa mga Huling Araw". Siyempre, kung may huling araw, meron ding huling oras. Kumbaga sa deadline ng pagpapasa ng "project" mo sa paaralan, huling araw ng deadline at huling oras mo na rin iyon. Kaya sa Iglesiang itinatag ni Manalo tupad ang pagdating ng mga bulaang propeta (Mateo 24:24) at mga Anti-Cristo (1 Juan 2:18).

Ano nga ba ang Anti-Cristo? Bibliya na rin po ang sasagot:

"Sapagka't maraming magdaraya na nangagsilitaw sa sanglibutan, sa makatuwid ay ang mga hindi nangagpapahayag na si Jesucristo ay napariritong nasa laman. Ito ang magdaraya at ang anticristo." (2 Juan 1:7)

Ayun. Sapul na naman sa mga INC. Ang mga anti-Cristo ay hindi naniniwala at hindi nangagpapahayag na si Cristo ay napaparitong nasa laman o nagkatawang-tao. Ang mga INC ay dapat tawaging mga Anti-Cristo dahil ang paniniwala nila ay hindi nagkatawang-tao si Cristo bagkus siya ay pinanganak ni Maria na "tao lamang".


Kung susumahin ang tatlong talata ( Mateo 24, 1 Juan 2:18, at 2 Juan 1:7), tupad itong lahat sa "Iglesia ni Cristo" ni Manalo. Ibig sabihin, sa ginagamit nilang Bibliya na ginawa ng Simbahang Katolika ay makikita ang mga ebidensya na ang Iglesiang tinatag ni Manalo ang tumalikod. Sila ang mga bulaang propeta at mga Anti-Cristo na nililigaw ang maraming tao.



MABUHAY AT PAGPALAIN ANG SANTA IGLESIA!

ANG "ANGHEL" NA NAGKASALA by Sarah Isaac

Rebulto ni Felix Manalo  sa Ka-Diliman Quezon City

ANG "ANGHEL NA NAGKASALA":

ANG ANGHEL NA NAG-KASALA!...NAKAGAPOS SA KA-Diliman.."NAKATINGALA SA LANGIT"...NAGHIHINTAY SA ARAW NG PAGHUHUKOM!---2 PEDRO 2:4

BAKIT NAKAKASIGURO KAMING "HINDI SUGO" NG DIOS SI FELIX Y. MANALO?

Ito ay sa dahilang ang mga DOKTRINA o aral na itinataguyod ni FYM ay pawang mga kinuha at kinalap nya mula sa IBANG MGA SECTANG PANRELIHIYON!

AMINADO NAMAN PO ANG MGA KAANIB AT PAMAMAHALA NG INM NA SI FYM AY "NAG-ARAL" SA IBAT-IBANG PAARALAN NG MGA PROTESTANTE AT MAGING SA MGA NON-SECTARIAN SCHOOLS:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Manalo
RECOGNITION:
The Genius Divinical College of Manila on Avenida, Rizal, a non-sectarian institution headed by Eugenio Guerero, conferred on Felix Manalo the degree of Master of Biblo-Science honoris causa on March 28, 1931.[10] # ^ a b Palafox, First Executive Minister, NHI

KUNG SI FYM AY "TUNAY" NA SUGO NG DIOS, AY DAPAT SANA AY MAY KAALAMAN SIYANG NAGBUHAT SA DIOS!!! HINDI NAGBUHAT SA MGA SINASABI NYANG "MGA MINISTRO NI SATANAS"

ito ang patotoo ng Bibliya ukol sa mga TUNAY na SUGO ng Dios:

"At habang ang ESPIRITU'Y NASA INYO ay HINDI KAKAILANGANING "TURUAN PA NG IBA"! -1JUAN 1:27

MALIWANAG AYON KAY APOSTOL JUAN, "KUNG NASA ISANG SUGO NI CRISTO ANG ESPIRITU NG DIOS AY HINDI NA ANIYA KAYLANGAN PANG ITO AY TURUAN PA NG IBANG TAO O IBANG DI NILA KAPANANAMPALATAYA!"

BAKIT SINABI NI APOSTOL JUAN ANG GAYUN?

2 PEDRO 2:1
"...may darating sa gitna ninyo na mga HUWAD NA GURO. Lihim silang magtuturo ng mga maling aral na ang DULOT AY KAPAHAMAKAN."

AYON SA KANILANG "PASUGO" HUWAD BA ANG MGA PASTOR PROTESTANTE NA NAGTURO KAY FYM SA KANYANG PINASUKANG PROTESTANT SCHOOL?

PASUGO, AUGUST 1961, PAGE 39:
"Dapat na nating itakwil ang mga paring katoliko at mga PASTOR PROTESTANTE, SPAGKAT SILA'Y MGA MINISTRO NI SATANAS!"

TUNAY NGA NA "KAPAHAMAKAN" ANG DULOT NG PAKIKINIG SA TURO NG MGA BULAANG MINISTRO...

KAPAHAMAKAN KANINO?

2 PEDRO 2:2
"At MARAMI silang mahihikayat na sumunod sa KANILANG KAHALAYAN; at dahil dito pati ang DAAN NG KATOTOHANAN AY "MAPAPARATANGAN" NG MASAMA"

KANINO KAYA NATUPAD ANG HULANG ITO NI APOSTOL PEDRO??

"AT MARAMI SILANG MAHIHIKAYAT na sumunod sa KANILANG KAHALAYAN"

KAMUSTA NA KAYA ANG NAGING KASONG RAPE NI GINOONG FYM??

TUNAY NGA ANG PAG-DAMI NG NAPAPANIWALA NI GINOONG FYM...

IBIG BANG SABIHIN NA ANG BULAANG GURO AY "MAGALING MANLINLANG"?

2 PEDRO 2:3
" sa kanilang KASAKIMAN, LILINLANGIN nila kayo sa pamamagitan ng ng kanilang "MATATAMIS NA PANANALITA"

TUNAY NGA NA SA GALING NG PANANALITA NI GINOONG FYM MANALO, SA KABILA NG MGA KAHALAYANG KANYANG KINASANGKUTAN AY MARAMI PARIN SIYANG NAHIKAYAT...

AT DAHIL SA GALING NIYANG MANGUSAP AY NAGTAMO SIYA NG PARANGAL MULA RIN SA IBANG DENOMINASYONG PANRELIHIYON:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Manalo
Recognition

The church’s growth and expansion met many criticisms and persecutions. Its leaders and members alike were often ridiculed and maligned. However, Felix Manalo was an ELOQUENT SPEAKER, and he could deliver a skillful argument, had a facility in the use of Scriptures and a mastery in organization.[12]

The ministers of the Christian Mission honored him on December 12, 1918, as an OUTSTANDING EVANGELIST.[2]

TUNAY NGA KAYA NA ANG MGA "HULA" SA MGA NAILAHAD NA TALATA AY NATUPAD KAY GINOONG FYM?

2 PEDRO 2:4
"Hundi pinatawad ng Dios ang mga ANGHEL na NAGKASALA, Sila'y itinapon sa impyerno kung saan sila'y iginapos sa KADILIMAN, upang doon HINTAYIN ANG ARAW NG PAGHUHUKOM."

Saan ba nakagapos ang kaluluwa ng Ginoong FYM upang MAGHINTAY sa ARAW NG PAGHUHUKOM?

ANG "REBULTO" NI FYM AY KASALUKUYANG NAKATINDIG SA "KA-DILIMAN" CENTRAL TEMPLE, SA QUEZON CITY, "NAKATINGALA SA LANGIT" NA ANIMO'Y NAGHIHINTAY SA "ARAW NG PAGHUHUKOM!

TUNAY NGA NA ANG ISA SA MGA DOCTRINA NG MGA INM AY "ANG PAGHIHINTAY" SA ARAW NG PAGHUHUKOM! :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iglesia_ni_Cristo
Eschatology
See als

Members believe that when a person dies, his/her body and soul both die and go into the GRAVE where both would remain until THE SECOND COMING OF CHRIST. Upon his return, all dead members of the Iglesia ni Cristo, including Manalo, would be resurrected to join living INC members. They would be rewarded by living in the Holy City together with God the Father, Christ, and Manalo. After 1,000 years, a second resurrection would occur, and non-INC members will experience second death which is the Lake of Fire or Dagat-dagatang Apoy (in Tagalog).[2]
[edit] ^ a b c d e f g h i Anne C. Harper. "Iglesia ni Cristo". StJ's Encyclopedia of New Religious Movements (Sacred Tribes Press): 1–3. http://www.sacredtribesjournal.org/stj/images/Encyclopedia/Iglesia_Cristo.pdf.

ANG ANGHEL NA NAG-KASALA!...NAKAGAPOS SA KA-Diliman.."NAKATINGALA SA LANGIT"...NAGHIHINTAY SA ARAW NG PAGHUHUKOM!---2 PEDRO 2:4

INC NA HINDI ALAM ANG KAPANANGAKAN NI HESUS, MANGMANG SA "CHRISTIANITY"

 Alvin Cortez FROM FACEBOOK:

 Kapanganakan ni CRISTO nasa bible ba? Hindi nyo alam kung ano talaga ang tinatawag na CHRISTIAN. Hindi kayo yan. Sinasabi nyo lang christian kayo, pero sa pananalita, kilos at gawa, never kayong naging CHRISTIAN!

------------

SAGOT:

 

 [Kapanganakan ni CRISTO nasa bible ba?]

 OO NASA BIBLIYA. SHUNGA KA? SA  EBANGHELYO BINABANGGIT YAN:

Mateo 1:18-25
"Ang pagkapanganak nga kay Jesucristo ay ganito: Nang si Maria na kaniyang ina ay magaasawa kay Jose, bago sila magsama ay nasumpungang siya'y nagdadalang-tao sa pamamagitan ng Espiritu Santo. At si Jose na kaniyang asawa, palibhasa'y lalaking matuwid, at ayaw na ihayag sa madla ang kaniyang kapurihan, ay nagpasiyang hiwalayan siya ng lihim. Datapuwa't samantalang pinagiisip niya ito, narito, ang isang anghel ng Panginoon ay napakita sa kaniya sa panaginip, na nagsasabi: Jose, anak ni David, huwag kang mangamba sa pagtanggap kay Maria na iyong asawa: sapagka't ang kaniyang dinadalang-tao ay sa Espiritu Santo. At siya'y manganganak ng isang lalake; at ang pangalang itatawag mo sa kaniya'y JESUS; sapagka't ililigtas niya ang kaniyang bayan sa kanilang mga kasalanan. At nangyari nga ang lahat ng ito, upang maganap ang sinalita ng Panginoon sa pamamagitan ng propeta, na nagsasabi, Narito, ang dalaga'y magdadalang-tao at manganganak ng isang lalake, At ang pangalang itatawag nila sa kaniya ay Emmanuel; na kung liliwanagin, ay sumasa atin ang Dios. At nagbangon si Jose sa kaniyang pagkakatulog, at ginawa niya ang ayon sa ipinagutos sa kaniya ng anghel ng Panginoon, at tinanggap ang kaniyang asawa; At hindi nakilala siya hanggang sa maipanganak ang isang lalake: at tinawag niya ang kaniyang pangalang JESUS" 

Mateo 2:1

"Nang ipanganak nga si Jesus sa Bet-lehem ng Judea sa mga kaarawan ng haring si Herodes, narito, ang mga Pantas na lalake ay nagsidating sa Jerusalem mula sa silanganan, na nagsisipagsabi..."

 DI MO ALAM YAN? HAHAHA. NAKAKATAWA KA NAMAN, PARA KANG WALANG ALAM. OR IN SHORT WALA KA TALAGANG ALAM. HAHAHA. PALIBHASA KASI KAPANANGAKAN NG PEKENG SUGO NIYO ANG IPINAGDIDIWANG NIYO.


[Hindi nyo alam kung ano talaga ang tinatawag na CHRISTIAN.]

SIGE NGA. DEFINE "CHRISTIAN". HAHAHAHAHA.


A Christian is a person who adheres to Christianity, an Abrahamic, monotheistic religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus of Nazareth as recorded in the Canonical gospels and the letters of the New Testament. "Christian" derives from the Koine Greek word Christ, a translation of the Biblical Hebrew term Messiah. Most Christians believe in the doctrine of the Trinity ("tri-unity"), a description of God as Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

ANO NAMAN ANG CHRISTIANITY?

Christianity (from the Ancient Greek: Χριστιανός Christianos) is a monotheistic and Abrahamic religion based on the life and teachings of Jesus as presented in canonical gospels and other New Testament writings Adherents of the Christian faith are known as Christians.

 [Hindi kayo yan.]

OH TALAGA? ANG KAPAL NAMAN NG MUKHA MO. ANO BA ANG PINANINIWALAAN NG ISANG KRISTIYANO?:

  Christians generally believe Jesus is the Son of God, God having become human and the saviour of humanity.

GOD HAVING BECOME HUMAN. IBIG SABIHIN, NAGKATAWANG-TAO. DOKTRINA NIYO BA 'YAN? HINDI DIBA? KAMI DOKTRINA YAN. PINANINIWALAAN YAN. KAYO HINDI. KAYA KAMI ANG KRISTIYANO AT KAYO ANG HINDI AT PEKE.
  
 [Sinasabi nyo lang christian kayo, pero sa pananalita, kilos at gawa, never kayong naging CHRISTIAN!]

SA INYO DAPAT SABIHIN YAN DAHIL IMBES NA SABIHIN NIYONG "AKO'Y ISANG KRISTIYANO", SINASABI NIYONG "AKO'Y IGLESIA NI CRISTO".

AT PROUD NA PROUD PA KAYO SA PAGSABI NUN SA INONG KORPORASYON NA MAY KORUPSYON. AT HINDI KAYO KRISTIYANO DAHIL BULAANG RELIHIYON KAYO. PEKE. AT NAKAREHISTRO PA SA PATENT OFFICE NG AMERICA NA CORPORATION AT NAKAPANGALAN KAY FELIX MANALO. AT HINDI KAY JESUCRISTO. KAYA HINDI SI CRISTO NAGTATAG NG IGLESIA NIYO. HAHAHA. 

 

ANG KASANGKAPAN NG DIABLO:MINISTRO NG INC BY ERAÑO MANALO

SALAMAT ERAÑO MANALO AT IBINUNYAG MO ANG KATOTOHANAN SA MGA MINISTRO NIYO SA IGLESIA NG AMA MO.

BABAENG INC, SINASAMBA ANG KABAONG NI MANALO

Sa larawang ito, makikita na humawak ang babaeng ito sa kabaong ni Erano Manalo.

SINASAMBA NG BABAENG NASA LARAWAN ANG BANGKAY NI ERAÑO MANALO DAHIL HINAHAWAKAN NIYA ANG KABAONG NITO. AYON NA RIN SA KANILA ANG PAGHIPO SA ISANG IMAHEN, O RELIKYA AY PAGSAMBA NA DAW DIUMANO.

GINAGAWA NG MGA KATOLIKO ANG PAGHIPO SA MGA LARAWAN BILANG PAGGALANG, (VENERATION) AT HINDI PAGSAMBA (WORSHIP).

IBIG SABIHIN, ANG BABAENG ITO AY SINAMBA ANG BANGKAY NI MANALO DAHIL HINIPO NIYA ITO. SILA NA DIN ANG GUMAGAWA NG KAMALIAN DAW DIUMANO NG MGA KATOLIKO. KAHIT WALA NAMAN PONG MALI SA GINAGAWA NATING PAGGALANG.

MGA BULAANG CRISTO, SUGO DAW NG DIYOS:

1. Joseph Smith- Propeta "daw" na nagpabalik ng Iglesiang tumalikod at nagtatag ng "Iglesia Ni Jesucristo ng mga Banal sa Huling Araw" o "Church of Jesus Christ of latter-day saints". Nagpakita "daw" sa kanya ang Diyos Ama at ang Panginoong Jesus at si Moroni na isulat ang isang aklat na ngayon ay tawag na "Ang Aklat ni Mormon: Isa pang Tipan ni Jesucristo". Sabi ni Joseph Smith, "Mas tama ang Aklat ni Mormon kaysa sa ibang libro" e di kasama na rin ang Biblia? Isang malaking pagsuway na yan sa Juan 10:35, Roma 15:4, 2 Timoteo 3:16-17!

2. Ellen Gould White- Propeta "daw" sa huling araw. Mayroon siyang tinatawag na "Spirit of Prophecy" at ang aklat na pinakamagatang, "The Great Controversy" na may halong panira sa IKAR (Iglesia Katolika Apostolika Romana) at sa ibang sektang Protestante. Tinuturo din nya na magnilay sa araw ng Sabbath na siyang ika-7 na araw at hindi sa unang araw ng sanlinggo tulad ng ginagawa ng mga unang Cristiano sa Gawa 20:7.

3. Felix Ysagun Manalo- anghel "daw" na tinutukoy ng Apocalipsis 7:2-3 subalit ang anghel ay ang espiritung isinugo ng Diyos upang tulungan ang magtatamo ng kaligtasan sa Hebreo 1:14. Siya "daw" ang ibong mandaragit sa Isaias 46:11 pero natupad ito kay Haring Cyrus ng Persia dahil siya ang "taong nagbuhat sa silangan" sa Isaias 41:2 at ang ibong mandaragit sa Isaias 46:11 ay manggagaling sa silangan. Siya rin "daw" ang Uod na Jacob sa Isaias 41:14 subalit ang bayang Israel ang Uod na tinutukoy ni Yahweh sa talatang ito at siya ang Uod sa Awit 22:6-7 subalit ito ang propesiya patungkol kay Jesus na natupad sa Mateo 27:41-44.

4. Eliseo Soriano- Sugo "daw" ng Diyos pero puro taliwas ang aral nya sa Biblia. Gaya na lang ng ihi ginagawang gamot, ang Diyos "daw" may pwet, at ang Diyos daw mayroon Siyang bagay na imposibleng gawin at yun ay ang magsinungaling sa Tito 1:2 pero kung titignan natin ang talata, ipinapahayag ni San Pablo ang sinlessness ng Diyos.

5. Apollo C. Quiboloy- Siya "daw" ang Hinirang na Anak ng Diyos sa huling araw. Pero kung titignan natin, ang Hinirang ng Diyos na Anak Niya ay si Jesus sa Awit 2:2. Hinirang si Jesus ng Diyos Ama sa Gawa 3:20 at Siya, na Verbong Diyos sa Juan 1:1 ang hahatol sa mga patay at sa mga buhay sa 2 Corinto 5:10. Ginagamit niya ang mga talatang nagpapatukoy sa Mesias para patunayang siya ang katuparan niyon.

6. Harold Camping- Isang pastor ng "FAMILY RADIO" na nagsabing gugunaw ang mundo at hindi nangyari gaya na lang ng isinalaysay nya na darating si Jesus sa Mayo 21, 2011 pero hindi nangyari. Sabi ng Biblia, ang Ama lamang ang nakakaalam ng Araw na yaon at ang Anak sa Mateo 24:36.

ANO ANG MASASABI NG BIBLIA UKOL SA MGA BULAANG SUGO, CRISTO, APOSTOL AT PROPETA?

"At ito ang palatandaan: kapag hindi nangyari o nagkatotoo ang sinabi ng propeta, yaon ay hindi nagmula kay Yahweh; sariling katha niya yaon. Huwag ninyo siya papansinin" (Deuteronomio 18:22)

"Sapagkat darating ang mga bulaang cristo at mga bulaang propeta at gagawa ng mga himala upang malinlang, kung maaari, pati na ang mga hinirang" (Mateo 24:24)

"At huwag patakhan! Sapagkat si Satanas ay maaari ring magkunwaring anghel ng kaliwanagan. Kaya't hindi kataka-taka kung ang mga lingkod niya'y magkukunwaring lingkod ng katuwiran. Ang kanilang kahihinatnan ay ayon lamang sa kanilang gawa" (2 Corinto 11:14-15)